Saturday, 3 August 2013

Berkshire Hathaway's holdings in listed companies and their return on equity



Berkshire Hathaway's holdings in listed companies and their return on equity:

I've been spending a bit of time recently reading over large cap US stocks. I tend to look over the following information to get a quick overview of a company: Return On Equity (ROE), Debt to Equity, Price to Earnings Ratio (PE Ratio).

S&P have some good information so I decided to look over Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway's largest listed holdings from their latest 2012 annual shareholder letter and analyse their Return On Equity (click to enlarge image).




Here are several of Berkshire's holdings in which I found their Return On Equity from Standard & Poors data:

Sample Berkshire Hathaway holdings ROE
Year 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003
American Express 23.8 27.8 26.7 16.5 24.3 37.6 35.4 24.2 22.4 20.6
Coca Cola 28 27.4 42.5 30.2 27.5 30.9 30.5 30.2 32.3 33.6
IBM 85.2 73.4 64.9 74.4 58.8 36.6 30.6 24.7 29.3 30.1
Procter & Gamble 13.9 18.5 17.8 17.2 17.9 16.3 22.1 45.7 41.8 37.9
Wal-Mart 23 23.5 22.1 21.2 20.4 20.4 21.2 21.9 22.1 21.3
Wells Fargo 13.1 13.1 11.1 14.3 4.9 17.2 19.8 19.7 19.5 19.3



Note this is only a sample but quick look at these selected companies shows they all have 'high' Return On Equity. By 'high' I mean above 20% with the only exception being Wells Fargo.






Saturday, 23 March 2013

Taleb, Spitznagel, Prabai and...Buckminster Fuller?



Still on the Antifragile ideas again! 

Although I've seen nearly all of Taleb's talks on Youtube I've just found one that's on Bloomberg only. His latest interview which I found is here: 
http://www.gurufocus.com/news/209020/nassim-taleb--my-fear-of-bonds-is-forcing-me-to-buy-stocks

On another note, an ex-colleague once recommended I also check out Mark Spitznagel of the hedge fund Universa Investment LP. Spitznagel and Taleb has often worked together and share many similar views. Spitznagel also writes articles semi-regularly, some of which can be found here:



Ok, besides the recent 'long volatility' option trader / investors I've been focusing on recently I decided to revisit a Mohnish Prabai value investing interview. I have to say the Prabai interview is very worthwhile and highly recommended. In it he speaks about 'cloning' success! The interview can found here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBXRNH9VfhA

On a final note, Nassim often speaks about certain environments requiring 'constant stressors' to remain healthy (antifragile). He often uses example of the economy and the human body. For example, if you were to put a human into outer space or a sterile environment without any stress - no stress from gravity or bacteria - then if they were to return back to a normal city life their body would suffer. Imagine someone stepping back into a New York subway immediately after years living in a sterile environment!

This idea of requiring constant stress reminds me of Buckminster Fuller's concepts of tensegrity: constant tension, discontinuous compression. This concept can be seen in building resilient structures and includes the structure of the human body. See an short example here: http://www.biotensegrity.com/continuous_tension_discontinuous_compression.php

For those with an interest in investing, health, architecture I hope you enjoyed this post. Take care


Sunday, 10 March 2013

Trading: From Taleb to Jeff Yass and poker


While currently reading Dynamic Hedging by Nassim Nicholas Taleb I came across a mention of Jeff Yass. Taleb says the greater fool theory is well explained by market maker Jeff Yass on his approach to  trading options:

"Somehow "value" is conditional on the most recent information rather than the overall picture. If a market operator is given a position by someone else, he receives more than a position: He gets information, and the information would necessarily eradicate the edge." (Taleb, 1997)

This of course led to do a quick google search on Jeff Yass. Unfortunately I couldn't find any youtube  videos of his interviews/speeches. I found out he was a rather private individual but luckily came in rather comprehensive article published by the Philidelphia Magazine. The article details how Yass has used the disciplines and skills from playing poker to since his college days to consistently win on the markets over the last 30 years.

I enjoyed the article and hope you do too. Although I don't consider myself a trader (or poker) player, like Rakim said, you have to respect the technique!

Link to article is here: http://www.phillymag.com/articles/beating-the-odds/

Friday, 1 March 2013

Beyond margin of safety


I'm sure most of you have heard of The Motley Fool so I wanted to recommend a blog by ex-Motley Fool writer Dean Morel called 'Fusion Investing'.

Having recently finished Nassim Taleb's 'Antifragiilty' I the article quite nicely combines the ethos of Benjamin Graham's margin of safety with Taleb's belief's on risk vs return.

The link is here:

http://www.fusioninvesting.com/2013/02/step-beyond-margin-of-safety/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FusionInvesting+%28Fusion+Investing+and+Analysis%29

Hope you enjoy it!

Cheers

Sunday, 2 September 2012

Having recently re-read / re-listened to Nassim Taleb's books The Black Swan and Fooled By Randomness I began noticing some interesting points:

1. In Fooled By Randomness he talks about playing around with his Monte Carlo engine to create 'zorglubs' similar to how Richard Dawkin's describes evoluinoary methods in The Selfish Gene.

"My Monte Carlo engine took me on a few interesting adventures. While my colleagues were immersed in news stories, central bank announcements, earning reports, economic forecasts, sports results and, not least, office politics, I started toying with it in bordering fields to my home base of financial probability. A natural field of expansion for the amateur is evolutionary biology --the universality of its message and its application to markets are appealing. I started simulating populations of fast mutating animals called Zorglubs under climatic changes and witnessing the most unexpected of conclusions..."

Does anybody else think there is a relation here?

2. Taleb talks about maximising positive black swans which I took to mean an individual should look at ways to maximise one's options in life. That is, taking up options in all aspects of one's life, not just in the financial markets. For example, look out for options that you can take in negotiations that do not necessarily cost you to give up anything in return.

I've just finished listening to both of his books twice in a row and look to integrate some of his ideas into my investing life.

How have you found Taleb's works and have they benefitted you or not?


Friday, 29 June 2012

Checklist investing

Some like to believe the best investors must have the instincts for spotting a bargain amongst the thousands of shares in the market. But what discipline does a good investor possess that enables them to outperform the average over long periods of time?

A checklist approach for investing comes highly recommended if you truly wish to outperform over the long term. I admit the idea of a check list of investing may sound boring to some but having a methodical approach is likely to reward those who are disciplined enough to apply it. Charlie Munger has long advocated a checklist approach as a simple method to reduce risks of errors. “Checklist routines avoid a lot of errors. You should have all this elementary wisdom and then you should go through a mental checklist in order to use it. There is no other procedure in the world that will work as well.”

Possessing years of experience or access to multiple reports still does not stop the best investors from occasionally making errors in judgement. Formal checklists are common places in professionals such as aviation and medicine where lives are at risk Malcolm Gladwell, the author who coined the term ‘the tipping point’, describes in his book ‘Blink’ how the process of diagnosing heart attacks patients in a busy Cook County Chicago hospital emergency room was improved by the use of a simplified three question check list. Doctors were asked to collect less information and focus on three key criteria such as like blood pressure and fluid in the -while ignoring everything else like the patient's weight, age and medical history. As a result the hospital is now one of the top hospitals in the US in diagnosing chest pains.

In a world where investors are bombarded with constant information an investment checklist helps to filter out irrelevant information to allow focus on the key criteria for why a business succeeds and if it is a good buy. In fact Buffett has mentioned he has a mental checklist of four simple criteria when evaluating a business:
  1. Do I understand this business?
  2. Does the business possess a competitive advantage (economic moat)?
  3. Is the management able and honest?
  4. Is the price right? If so write the cheque.

In an investing environment with ever increasing investment options and complexity a check list will avoid many common errors of omission. We have all had the experience of finding what looks to be a sure-fire opportunity that we believe has been overlooked by crowd. Many value investors and fund managers have admitted in the past that if they had used a checklist it could have avoided costly investment mistakes during these heated moments! In a Forbes interview Mohnish Prabai the US fund manager who once bided US $650,100 for a charity lunch with Buffett confirmed that he now has implemented a formal checklist to systematically avoid repeating investment errors in the past.

Common check list areas include a mix of financial ratios (i.e. interest cover, debt to equity) and qualitative questions (do management have a stake in the business). Most of the answers should already be quite clear and going through the process should take less than an hour unless something striking appears or you lack the information which would prompt further research. One of the questions recently included in my checklist includes asking whether the sales revenue figures are based on boom-time earnings.

For example, are the current earnings estimates of Australian mining companies based on resource prices remaining stable or increasing? The revenue and profits of miners and mining services companies such as BHP and Monadelphous are linked to the prices of resources. Since resource prices have been increasing over the last several years due to booms in China and India this has led to good profits for many Australian resource companies.

However even without a prolonged slowdown in China it is likely that resource prices are unlikely to be maintained over the longer term. Note that when it comes to markets for iron ore, oil and even gold the only available tool to predict prices comes from using technical analysis which for fundamental value investors is an area we try not to rely too heavily on.

I'm interested to know what are some of the other checklist questions that people currently use and also what is your opinion on the ideal number of questions to be included on a checklist to avoid over analysis paralysis?

Tuesday, 3 January 2012

Risk vs Uncertainty

For those of you interested in interviews with famous value investors I would recommend the Value Investing videos on Youtube hosted by Steve Forbes. Tonight I was listening to an interview with hedge fund manager Mohnish Pabrai. If the name sounds familiar it is because Pabrai made headlines when he bid $650,100 in 2007 for a lunch with Warren Buffett.


During the interview Pabrai mentions the difference between risk and uncertainly. Often we are taught that to achieve high returns we need to have high returns - "High risk, high return." Value investors however believe that Low Risk, High Returns are possible. In fact when you purchase a stock for less than it traded yesterday, assuming future prospects have not changed then the risk has actually decreased. 


Pabrai uses his previous entrepreneurial background and a story about Microsoft's Bill Gates as an example to illustrate the point. Firstly he states that although entrepreneurs are seen as high risk takers, successful entrepreneurs actually take all steps to lower risk. 


Pabrai explains that he has founded three businesses during his career. The first was low risk and generated huge capital - a huge success. The second he invested a large amount of capital and suffered major losses. The third was founding a hedge fund which was low risk with potential for high payoffs. So far the third business has been a success.


According to his research successful billionaires such as Richard Branson and Bill Gates also followed the low risk, high return approach. He explains that Microsoft has never required more than $50,000 of initial capital to fund it's business growth and success. Microsoft founders Bill Gates and Paul Allen had low risk, but they did have high uncertainty. High uncertainly allowed for a range of possibilities from Gates and Allen going broke on one extreme to them becoming billionaires on the other extreme. 


High uncertainly does not necessarily mean high risk - a key point the investors need to remember. Although an investment may have high uncertainty as long as the risks are sufficiently low then it could still become a runaway success. Pabrai calls it the "Heads, I win; tails, I don't lose much" approach. In investing speak 'minimise the downside risk, and the upside will look after itself.'