Having read Roger Montgomery's book Value.able I have created an online spreadsheet using his formula to value shares. If interested to have a look at the spreadsheet then feel free to follow the link from my earlier November post 'Which of these stocks is currently attractive?'
Alternatively if you have any shares which you want me to value using their 2011 annual report then please feel free to let me know via a reply below.
With the current state of global economy such as European sovereign debt crisis and rehypothecation, I believe shares will continue to become even more attractive in coming months.
For example, JB Hi-Fi (ASX:JBH) is currently trading at $11.34 (28/12/11) after a surprise downgrade of their profit forecast for 2012. Could this be the chance to buy that value investors have been waiting for? I've updated my online calculator to include an estimated 10% drop in profit for JBH: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoGU3QVjAi2tdEZxTVBEZzc3bUtxa0RCaWJnTDBTcVE#gid=7
Value investors around the world would currently be on high alert for opportunities. For example, Orbis Investment Management (Australia) has recently announced they are now a significant shareholder of Matrix Composites and Engineering (ASX:MCE) with a 5.48% share.
Those unfamiliar with Orbis will find this Forbes article an interesting read. The article explains their contrarian, Buffett-style value investing principles: http://www.forbes.com/global/2001/0820/036.html
The basic valuation formula is: ROE / ROR x Equity per share.
ROE = Return on equity
ROR = Required rate of return
However Roger improves on the basic formula by breaking the first part of the equation (ROE/ROR) into two parts: 1. Profit retained 2. Profit paid out as dividend.
By doing this the dividend payout ratio of the company is taken into account. Basically if you had a company with high sustainable ROE you would benefit from retaining the profit so it can grow to an even larger amount than paying it out in dividends.
For individual stock requests I'll discuss the further assumptions used in the formula and also the variables such as required rate of return.
Again, I'm also on the look out for good value shares at the moment and willing to value them if you want to let me know a stock you are interested in!
Cheers
Sterling
Showing posts with label Roger Montgomery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roger Montgomery. Show all posts
Tuesday, 27 December 2011
Friday, 23 December 2011
Sovereign debt, Gold and Hypothecation
"Capitalism without bankruptcy is like Christianity without hell" Borman
When speaking in a 15/11/2011 BBC interview Bass was questioned on the morality of investors of making gains from the US subprime mortgage crisis. Basically the interviewer asked if it was right or wrong to profit from the misfortunes of people who over-borrowed and lost their homes in the US. He quite succinctly replied that the such events would occur regardless of his involvement and that he had a fiduciary duty to protect his client's funds. He gave the following quote: "Capitalism without bankruptcy is Christianity without hell." I must admit that it was the first time I had heard that quote before!
Currently I'm reading his latest letter to Hayman Capital shareholders where he is extremely certain of a Japanese sovereign debt default following the default of EU nations. He paints the following picture of the current situation:
"Imagine a team of mountain climbers all strapped together for safety as they ascend a treacherous peak. While they are all holding on to the mountain there is no additional strain placed on each other. Now consider what happens if one climber, let’s call him Stavros, slips and loses his grip. He places added strain on the remaining climbers. One climber might no make a difference, but as Seamus, Pablo and Jose each lose their grip they not only add extra total dead weight to the team but also increase the amount each other climber has to carry, until finally Francois, Luigi and Takehiro let go and poor Jurgen, and Uncle Sam are left trying to keep the whole team on the mountain."
In particular he is speaking about the unsustainable sovereign debts positions of Greece, Italy, Ireland, Iceland, Spain, Belgium, Japan, Portugal, France and Japan. To quote Bass again: "We believe the debts of the following nations, among others, are not sustainable in the current economic environment: Greece, Italy, Japan, Ireland, Iceland, Japan, Spain, Belgium, Japan, Portugal, France, and have we mentioned Japan?"
So where to for cautious investors - Cash, guns or gold? We all know the implications of holding cash with all the money 'printing' being done by the world's central banks. As for guns well known financial commentators such as Robert Kiyosaki have been frequently talking about the possibility of social upheaval and alluding to the insurance policy offered by buying a gun to protect one's assets from upcoming unemployed and desperate masses! Although I do believe Kiyosaki is a very successful investor he has been know to make repeated alarmist comments in his most recent posts on his site www.conspiracyoftherich.com
As for gold the question I want to discuss is between physical or paper? In my personal opinion investing a portion of ones fund in gold is always going to be a smart move. Throughout history regardless of country or upbringing man has always had used the metal as a store of wealth and hedge against fiat currency manipulation. Dylan Grice of Societe Generale has written about the timing of gold purchases and sales in Popular Delusions. Those interested in reading the full article can find it within the 2010 annual report from Platinum Asset Management (PTM) which is where I read it.
Those of you with Australian self-managed super funds (SMSF) looking to invest in gold would mostly likely be looking at exchange traded funds such as Betashares Gold Bullion ETF (ASX code QAU). However with the recent issues surrounding hypothecation I became slightly wary of gold ETFs when I read the following article on Zero Hedge: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/gold-rehypotecation-unwind-begins-hsbc-sues-mf-global-over-disputed-ownership-physical-gold The article talks about HSBC suing MF Global over disputed ownership of physical gold that was re-hypothecated. The underlying worry for investors is whether MF Global used re-hypothecated client gold to satisfy liabilities and whether there are other occurrences of this occurring at other financial institutions.
Closer to home in Australia I'm wondering whether the same thing could occur if I purhased Australian listed ETF backed by gold bullion? As central bankers continue printing more money to reduce imminent volatility they are only causing the eventual consequences to be worse. Read The Black Swan of Cairo by Taleb & Blyth for details. However if I expect to protect myself from their actions by buying gold the last thing I would want is to find out my gold has been used as collateral for another parties transactions!
If you have any comments or find any errors in my post please feel free to let me know.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)